Archive for May, 2010

Jaimey Walking Bear

Chris Kemp, NASA’s CTO of Information Technology, speaks with O’Reilly Media’s Alex Howard about Nebula, open standards, innovation and more at the Gov 2.0 Expo in Washington, D.C.

Jaimey Walking Bear

Post via Alexander Howard | @digphile

Can state governments deliver more services with constrained budgets? How can social media and collaborative software be used to engage citizens and lead to better policy decisions or investments? Can open government lead to better e-government? In this interview, Alex Howard, Government 2.0 Washington Correspondent for O’Reilly Media, interview Carolyn Lawson about precisely these issues. Lawson is the Deputy Director, Technology Services Governance Division, Director of the eServices Office of the state of California.

You can read more about how California is delivering e-services over the Internet in a previous post on this blog.

Jaimey Walking Bear is on the Marketing team for Gov 2.0 Expo. He can be reached @gov2events or @jaimeywb

Jaimey Walking Bear

Welcome to Gov 2.0 Expo!

Although we like to assign geographic location to ideas and communities, technology and government are not exclusive to Silicon Valley, Tokyo, London, Hong Kong, or Washington, D.C. Hosting the inaugural Gov 2.0 Expo in the nation’s capitol will bring together citizens, technology companies and governments from around the United States and around the globe.

Visitors to the District of Columbia are often impressed and inspired by the monuments of history and government institutions that surrounding the National Mall. These monuments celebrate the people who not only founded America but also provided the constitutional framework that allowed public service, leadership and inspiration to flourish for generations to come. As the United States continues to grow as a nation, encourage innovation, and strive for a better government, we might do well to reflect upon the words forever emblazoned on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial by our third president.

I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.

The timelessness of Thomas Jefferson’s thinking lends weight to why the idea of “government 2.0” is so important now. These early days of 21st century are an optimal time to embrace and explore more than just technology. In 2010, collaborative techology can also enable the enrichment of people and improvement of processes inside of government to deliver more efficient services to all citizens. The Open Government Directive is leading the federal government to become more transparent, participatory and collaborative. As citizens rapidly adopt new technologies and ways of living, working, they are participating in civic life online in unprecedented numbers. “institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times.” Although this conference focus on technology, the tools are only one of the essential elements in this discussion. If government is to offer a platform that’s allows citizens to build better services and policies though open data, it’s crucial to understand how people are changing and successfully applying technology to solving the grand challenges of our times.

Gov 2.0 Expo will provide a springboard for participating in this continual evolution by focusing on technologies that enrich and advance the mission of government at the federal, state and local level. We are here to celebrate the people and projects that sustain and improve the institutions here in Washington and in other seats of government around the world. What we build upon here will add to the continual advancement of a more participatory, transparent, and collaborative government on every street.

Thank you for being part of the Gov 2.0 Expo,

Laurel Ruma (@laurelatoreilly) and Mark Drapeau (@cheeky_geeky
Program Co-Chairs

Jaimey Walking Bear

Hubspot social scientist Dan Zarrella shares his insighst and research on the most effective use social software.

Jaimey Walking Bear

How do you find pages that cite a permalink?. Microsoft evangelist Jon Udell describes a framework for sharing government meetings and records online.

Jaimey Walking Bear

by Alexander Howard  |  @digiphile

“What we have to do is open up the conversation about what it means to be a public servant,” said Carolyn Lawson, Director of eServices for the Office of the CIO, State of California. In kicking off the Gov 2.0 Expo’s first session, “Navigating the Maze, Lawson offered guidance, perspective, case studies and, appropriate to the topic of social media in government, lively give and take between the audience and presenter. Lawson explored the many ways that the state of California has employed e-services and online engagement strategies, along with a simple driver: cost. “Our workforce is furloughed three times a month,” said Lawson. “It’s really painful. Our exploding population really needs services.”

The reality of California’s budget woes come at a time when the expectation for government to be responsive online has never been higher. “Immediate access to data has become a cultural expectation,” said Lawson.
“The expectation is there now that government will be open, honest and will communicate.” Lawson described how both the California Unemployment Office and the Department of Motor Vehicles have used social media and online platforms to deliver better services without additional cost. “You can tweet @CA_EDD and get answers like how long until you get a check, where to go on the website or job fairs,” said Lawson. “I don’t think the creators of Twitter thought it would be a helpdesk for EDD.” That social response is paired by e-government services that enable workers to file for unemployment online. Lawson said that online applications for unemployment went up by about 1.8 million from the previous year. “What would have happened if we’d blocked that?”

California is using other online platforms and technologies to deliver services that have been affected by budget woes. California couldn’t afford to offer driver training in schools, explained Lawson. “Something had to be cut. What the DMV did, since they already had YouTube videos, is to create an entire curriculum.” The California DMV YouTube channel provides the means for every high school to watch training videos like the one below without additional cost:

“We were thinking of this a culturally relevant tool, not as a forum for expression” said Lawson. “These videos have more than nine million views. If we weren’t government, they’d be calling that viral. It’s all about being where people are.” And, on that count, the @CA_DMV has developed an iPhone app, “DMV Now.”

Lawson strongly defended both the importance of the role that social media engagement plays for the California state government and its utility. “Technology is not driving Web 2.0, Twitter or Facebook.,” she said. “People are driving these services. And blocking Web 2.0 isn’t going to solve your problems.” She made the analogy to the conversations about the telephone in the workplace in the early 20th century, or email in the 1990s. “What we do as a government when we cut off the ability to communicate through the Web 2.0 world is to remove our ability to be culturally relevant,” she said. Adopting social software or connection technology usage that emphasize protocol over common sense can be problematic as well. “One of the things that kills government’s ability to use social media is speaking to employees in terms of thou shalt, thou shalt not,” said Lawson. She shared a public available wiki of government social media resource that offers some best practices and frameworks for discussion or practice.

Lawson observed that California itself is still evolving in how it uses social media. “We still have many departments blocking the governor’s Twitter,” she said, alluding to Governor @Schwarzenegger‘s massively popular account. The challenge, as Lawson posed it, is to show how government use of social media combines with open data initiatives. “What are we afraid of? The consequences of transparent. We were really afraid of crowdsourcing ideas to improve California IT with Ideasalce. We got beat up – but we also got ideas. We’re the government: we’re going to get beat up. You can’t take it personally.”

Lawson broadly described a cultural shift going towards open government brought about by the Obama admin, though she recognized that many efforts had gone on before. “This is being pushed through by Obama’s transparency initiatives,” she said. “It used to be revolutionary for public documents to be available in a municipal building to people walking in. No more.”

So how should an organization tackle objections that put social media age into a technology issue, rather than a management challenge? “That’s where I have my ‘activity or accomplish’ conversation,” said Lawson. “Is this that conversation about the telephone in 1920s? Or is it something that we need to do to protect our data and information? You have to get people engaged in the conversation. That took us more than a year. If you can relate behavior to behavior to technology, that’s where you have a win.”

The bottom line is that nobody has this all figured out yet, said Lawson. “You just have to work your way through it.”

Jaimey Walking Bear

Transparency gets all the press, but participation and collaboration are equally important

by Alex Howard@digiphile | Originally posted on O’Reilly Radar; May 13, 2010

beth_noveck_webTransparency initiatives at the White House, one of the three elements of the Open Government Initiative, have received ample attention from mainstream media and groups like the Sunlight Foundation. The implementation of the other two elements, participation and collaboration, have not. Can citizens be empowered to participate and collaborate in governance?

To begin to answer that question, I spoke with Beth Simone Noveck, professor of law at New York Law School, director of the White House Open Government Initiative, and U.S. deputy chief technology officer. Noveck is the author of “Wiki Government,” where she wrote about using social networking technology to connect people to policymakers.

Read the full article and listen to interview with Beth Noveck

Jaimey Walking Bear is on the Marketing team for Gov 2.0 Expo. He can be reached @gov2events or @jaimeywb

Jaimey Walking Bear

by Alex Howard@digiphile | Originally posted on O’Reilly Radar; May 19, 2010

Richard BolyHow do you move from a culture of “need to know” to a culture of “need to share?” Richard Boly thinks about the answer to that question every day. Boly, a speaker at next week’s Gov 2.0 Expo, is the director of the Office of eDiplomacy at the State Department. His office is an applied technology think tank within the agency that’s focused on improving the agency’s communication and knowledge sharing.

Boly is responsible for overseeing Virtual Presence Posts (VPPs), enterprise search, classified web publishing, and social networking, including the development of “StateBook.” He recently spoke with me about all of these initiatives, as well as the cultural challenges of integrating social software into a large, distributed enterprise.

Read the full article

Jaimey Walking Bear is on the Marketing team for Gov 2.0 Expo. He can be reached @gov2events or @jaimeywb

Jaimey Walking Bear

Michael Edson on how the Smithsonian uses crowdsourcing and transparency to further its mission

Posted by James Turner | Originally posted to O’Reilly Radar; May 13. 2010

The Smithsonian Institution epitomizes the phrase “an embarrassment of riches.” With 137 million physical objects in its collection, and 28 distinct museums and research centers, you could spend the rest of your life there and not see everything.

Michael Edson, who serves as director of web and new media strategy for the Smithsonian, got his start cleaning cases in one of the art museums. He now oversees the Institution’s online presence, which he talks about in the following interview. He’ll expand on many of these same topics at the upcoming Gov 2.0 Expo.

Read the full article

Jaimey Walking Bear is on the Marketing team for Gov 2.0 Expo. He can be reached @gov2events or @jaimeywb

Jaimey Walking Bear

by Alex Howard@digiphile | Originally posted on O’Reilly Radar; May 12, 2010

Would you “like” a government agency on Facebook? Would you “like” a service delivered by a .gov website? How would you feel if a government official “liked” you back? How would you like to be Craig Newmarkidentified online?

There are no easy answers to these questions, as anyone who attended the FTC privacy workshops or recent “privacy camps” in the District of Columbia or San Francisco knows. Craig Newmark, the founder of craigslist.org, attended the privacy camp in San Francisco and shared a few thoughts about issues of trust, identity, social networking and government.

Online privacy is now even more top-of-mind for tens of millions of users, as Facebook’s social plug-ins roll out across the Internet, along with its instant personalization pilot. Thirty-three government agencies are on Facebook, with more than 400 pages between them. Those government agencies may not have added “like” buttons yet — but they’re interacting with citizens on Facebook, Citizen Tube, Google Moderator, Twitter and beyond.

Read full article

Jaimey Walking Bear is on the Marketing team for Gov 2.0 Expo. He can be reached @gov2events or @jaimeywb

Next »